What Will AI Do to Your Org Chart in 2027?

The leaders who survive the next reorg have one thing in common.

They changed their role before AI changed it for them.

That gap, between “we use AI tools” and “we run as an AI-native org”, is where teams stall, roadmaps stay reactive, and the manager becomes the bottleneck instead of the multiplier.

At ELC Meetup #42, three leaders from Ataccama, FTMO, and bleeding.dev open up how their own roles, teams, and processes changed. Not slides. What broke, what they kept, what they would do again.

---

What we’ll cover: Three angles on the same question:

Zdenek Obst [Ataccama]:

• Agentic pods as learning circles, not project teams. The principle of autonomy: what a team can decide without asking, and what changes once it can.

Jan Vejmola [FTMO]:

• AI inside QA and delivery. Where the human stays in the loop, and where it does not.

Petr Glaser [bleeding.dev]:

• The skills map, role by role. Not just engineers, marketing and HR need an AI skill set too, and a manager needs a plan to keep the team healthy while all of this changes under them.

You leave with a role-to-AI-skill map to hold up against your own org chart, and a shorter list of KPIs worth tracking into 2027.

This meetup is made possible by Ataccama and FTMO.

Come with your org chart. Leave with a plan to rewire it.

You leave with a role-to-AI-skill map to hold up against your own org chart, and a shorter list of KPIs worth tracking into 2027.

---

What makes our meetups different:

• Action-oriented: Every talk includes takeaway guides/frameworks you can photograph or access via QR code
• Case study focused: Real implementations, real results, real failures
• Interactive: Audience Q&A with people who have done this
• Practical: Skip the vendor pitches—hear from practitioners

---

Perfect for engineering leaders tired of AI marketing fluff who want practical insights.