The 1:1 where your strongest engineer has checked out, and the manager talks about sprint velocity.
The manager names it in the first two minutes: “You have been quiet for a month. What changed?”
Masterclass · 1 day
Your managers and tech leads stop postponing the feedback, the pushback, and the conflict that is quietly costing you your best people, and hold those conversations within a week of walking out.
Not on the honor system: seven days later, each participant reports back in the Engineering Leaders Slack, in front of their three matched peers. That is how we know it happened.
12,900 CZK per seat · from 150,000 CZK in-house





Not for
Who it is for
The program
The conversation happens this week, and the person leaves knowing exactly where they stand.
Disagreements get a decision date instead of a comment thread. Chronic waffling kills more roadmaps than wrong calls do.
Your leads shift from order-takers to peers in the room where the roadmap is set. The one Marian lived through Mews Series C.
Your async channels stop generating conflicts your meetings then have to clean up.
Your senior ICs move decisions instead of waiting for authority they will never get.

The 1:1 where your strongest engineer has checked out, and the manager talks about sprint velocity.
The manager names it in the first two minutes: “You have been quiet for a month. What changed?”
Two seniors dig in on an architecture decision, the thread hits 60 comments, nothing ships.
A structured disagreement with a decision date, a named owner, and both seniors still talking to each other.
The tech debt conversation the lead has drafted in their head for a quarter.
A tradeoff pitch the CEO can act on, framed in delivery risk, not in engineering pain.
Code review comments that demoralize the junior, so the reviewer silently fixes things instead.
Written feedback the junior learns from, and a junior who pushes back when the comment is wrong.
“We should talk about your performance” postponed for the third sprint in a row.
The conversation happens this week, with a concrete example and a concrete next step.




Format
Prices in CZK, excl. VAT. Published, not on request.
Faculty
Our team is unique. We are not consultants selling academic theories or empty certificates. They have built multiple unicorn companies and helped organizations scale from startups to scale-ups to established corporates.
In-house cohorts
No two organizations are the same. That is why our learning designers have crafted a selection of sessions focused on the key challenges faced by today's leaders. We work together to customize these sessions specifically to your needs. Our experts do the heavy lifting throughout the process and craft the program that is just right for your organization.


What nobody else offers
Nobody trains the architecture debate, the tech debt prioritization, the code review feedback. The six competitor programs touch none of them.
Staff engineers and tech leads own outcomes without owning people; the staff-track roles get nothing elsewhere.
Everyone teaches synchronous only. We train the written version too: code review, Slack, PR threads.
Evidence-first argument: what data moves an engineering audience, when to stop arguing and escalate.
A training vendor can copy the syllabus. They cannot copy the room: 12 months in the ELC Slack, seats at the next two meetups, and the witnessed check-in.
“A training vendor can copy the syllabus. They cannot copy the room.”
Proof, honestly labeled
The 9.3/10 and those logos come from our leadership programs across these companies, not from this masterclass alone. A verbatim alumni line about a real feedback conversation lands here once one is sourced with permission; we leave the slot rather than invent a quote.
Seats are limited to keep every room interactive. Register, or book a private cohort for your team.
Ready for the full operating rebuild? The AI-Native Engineering Manager →